Companies use employee monitoring software to gain insights into how their workforce operates. They analyze user activity data to manage software utilization, understand the average activity levels of their employees, and detect high-risk behavior.
If you would like to use these tools in your business you need to understand the potential negative effects of employee monitoring and the concerns that your employees may have. You need to work with them to create an employee monitoring strategy that is fair, transparent, and minimally invasive.
This article will discuss the potential negative effects of employee monitoring, the top concerns that employees have about workplace surveillance, and how to mitigate the negative effects that monitoring may have on employees.
Table of ContentsIn this section I will cover these concerns that employees have about workplace surveillance:
When management understands these concerns alongside the pros and cons of employee monitoring they can ensure that they track their workers in a way that benefits the whole team.
Transparency is essential when you monitor employees in the workplace. Secretly using monitoring tools is a serious privacy invasion as the stealth monitoring software may capture personal web browsing that may not have happened if they had known about the employee monitoring software.
A lack of transparency also contributes to negative perceptions among employees. Employees that are not aware if they are being monitored, why they are being monitored, and how they are being monitored are less likely to find employee monitoring acceptable.
Employees will naturally experience greater levels of anxiety when they do not have a clear understanding of their employer’s intentions.
Will their every move be micromanaged and scrutinized by an untrusting boss? Or is their employer genuinely using monitoring software to improve security and address only clearly egregious use of company assets?
Employee monitoring methods that are disproportionately invasive further contribute to negative perceptions of employee monitoring. The general principle that should be followed is to use the least invasive methods available to meet the company’s goals.
Using unproportionally invasive workplace surveillance methods to track employee activity is a surefire way to introduce negative effects such as decreased employee morale, work-related stress, and counterproductive work behaviors.
For example, the goal of enforcing acceptable use policies can be met by tracking internet browsing history without capturing individual keystrokes (keylogging).
Examples of invasive monitoring:
Whether or not any given form of monitoring is considered disproportionately invasive relies heavily on the employment context. Heavily regulated industries with stringent data loss prevention requirements will require more granular monitoring whereas employers seeking to improve productivity will need to use less invasive methods.
Transparency is critical here. Gartner’s “The Future of Employee Monitoring” report found that the acceptance rate of email monitoring grew by 20% among employees after their employer explained their reasons for monitoring emails.
Your employees need to be provided with a clear understanding of your intentions. They need to understand your organization’s goals and how the metrics being captured relate to those goals.
Proportionality between the impact on employee privacy as it relates to your company’s goals is also a significant factor. When you monitor your employees you should avoid monitoring more than is necessary for your legitimate business needs.
Once you have a clear plan of your goals you must use the least invasive methods available to meet them. Even if your business is not required to by law, consider using a Data Privacy Impact Assessment to help guide you through this process.
The second common concern from employees is that employee monitoring software data will be used as the sole source of truth when it comes to assessing their performance.
Employee monitoring makes sense as a business intelligence tool but it doesn’t provide the full context of how individual employees are performing. There are several work-adjacent tasks that aren’t adequately captured by monitoring computer activity.
Work-adjacent tasks include:
Employee monitoring data could be potentially sensitive. Once an employee’s data is captured it is left in the custody of their employer and they have limited control over its security and privacy. This causes concerns among employees that their data will not be adequately protected and safeguarded from misuse.
Examples of sensitive employee monitoring data:
This information can be abused if not properly safeguarded. Employees may fear the possibility of blackmail, data leaks, and social strife if it falls into the wrong hands. They may also be concerned the information will be unfairly used against them during performance reviews.
Monitoring will be perceived as far more invasive when individual employees are scrutinized based on the data captured. When employees are first approached with the concept of being monitored they may feel that their employer is seeking to find reasons to discipline them rather than focusing on their contributions. Micromanaging and punishing employees in this way breeds feelings of resentment and reduces their sense of autonomy.
While the constant monitoring and invasive practices that many companies partake in can make employees feel various forms of distress, there are legitimate benefits of tracking software that businesses should consider.
This section will provide a brief overview of the pros and cons of monitoring employees in a work environment. For a more detailed example, see our article on the pros and cons of employee monitoring.
Employee monitoring software provides employers and employees alike with a multitude of benefits. So long as the use of monitoring software is fair and transparent many of the potential negative perceptions of tracking software that employees feel can be mitigated.
Want to monitor your employees? Get started today with a 14-day free trial of BrowseReporter, CurrentWare’s employee monitoring software.
This next section will outline the potential negative effects of using employee surveillance tools in the workplace.
Many of these negative impacts are caused by companies using invasive surveillance and constant monitoring for micromanagement. Employers that would like to monitor employees in the workplace should read our workplace surveillance best practices white paper.
The white paper covers how to use employee monitoring software without harming morale and how employers can set privacy standards for their work environment.
While time tracking and computer activity monitoring certainly have their place in managing the productivity of employees, it is essential to respect their autonomy in the process. The way that employees work is uniquely personal to them, and they may worry that the tracking software will reduce their value to a series of numbers without considering how well they actually perform on the job.
An effective employee monitoring strategy empowers employees. They need to know that it’s being implemented for tangible benefits rather than stemming from a lack of trust in their ability to self-manage.
Alongside the perceived lack of trust that workplace surveillance can bring, a company that focuses exclusively on user activity reports for tracking productivity will force its workers to alter the way they normally perform their job.
For example, high-performing workers may not necessarily be using their computers 100% of the time. They may also take short web browsing breaks to refresh their mind in between tasks.
Businesses that do not consider this nuance will incentivize these high-performing workers to spend more time jiggling their mouse than actually performing at their best. When workers feel the need to exert energy gaming the surveillance system rather than working at their best they are bound to become disgruntled.
Employers must not use tech to control and micromanage their staff. Monitoring toilet breaks, tracking, and snooping on staff outside working hours creates fear and distrust. And it undermines morale.
Frances O’Grady, General Secretary of the British Trades Union Congress
Increased stress is a certainty among businesses that use employee tracking systems to micromanage their workers. This is especially true if the user activity reports will be used as the sole performance indicator as the workers will worry about whether or not the reports depict an accurate view of their contributions.
When it comes to monitoring employees in the workplace, many believe that if an employee is using company equipment, on company time, and getting paid by the company, that the company has every right to monitor their equipment and what the employee is doing with it.
Unfortunately, it is not so simple and there are plenty of legal and ethical grey areas.
Ultimately, it all comes down to the perceived expectation of privacy that employees have.
For example, many businesses allow employees to use company-provided equipment for personal use. With that precedent set, workers may feel that they can safely use the internet to search for articles about personal topics such as health status, religion, ethnicity, etc. without this information being leaked to their employers or coworkers.
For this reason, companies need to clearly communicate the level of privacy that their workers can expect. These standards must be acknowledged through a signed workplace monitoring policy and consistently communicated by management throughout their employment.
Furthermore, remote workers will have their own set of privacy expectations as well—particularly if they use their personal devices to do their job. The remote environment of work-from-home employees also feels more personal and intimate than a standard office space, which may lead remote workers to expect more privacy.
Employee monitoring is an excellent tool for understanding how your workforce operates.
Unfortunately a history of overly-invasive deployments has caused serious concerns among employees, like:
Is my employer spying on me?
They’re just doing this to find an excuse to fire me
If they’re monitoring what I do at work, they obviously don’t trust me
This is not what you want your employees to feel.
In this video I’m going to guide you through the best practices for monitoring employees so you can avoid these mistakes and concerns from your employees
Hello and welcome to the CurrentWare YouTube channel.
My name is Neel Lukka and I am the managing director here at CurrentWare.
After watching this video you can learn more about this topic by reading our new white paper “Employee Monitoring: Best practices for balancing productivity, security and privacy”
You can find the link for that in the description below.
Before we start, I just want to give a quick disclaimer here.
I’m not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. These tips are for informational purposes only. If you want to use employee monitoring software in your company be sure to consult with a legal professional first.
Alright, let’s jump in
First up is the very best tip I can give you.
If you want to succeed, you have to let your employees know that they are being monitored.
Employees that do not know if they are being monitored, why they are being monitored, and how they are being monitored are more likely to have negative reactions to being monitored,
such as
Having higher rates of stress and anxiety
Being less likely to accept being monitored
And, ironically, becoming less productive
That’s not to say that transparency is going to negate each and every concern that your employees may have.
But if you start with transparency from the very beginning you have a far better chance of proving to your employees that these tools aren’t being used to spy on them.
By being transparent you’re also giving the chance to hear about their concerns from the start. This lets you work with them to make an employee monitoring strategy that is fair and minimally invasive.
Here are 4 transparency boosting tips:
Involve a representative sample of employees when you start planning your goals and the metrics you want to capture
Tell your employees what metrics are being captured, how they’ll be used, and what is being used to capture them
Have your staff read and sign policies that disclose your intended use of the employee monitoring software
and finally, give them access to their own data so they can see exactly what’s being captured. They can even use this data to manage their own productivity, which is a major bonus
The second tip I have for you is don’t use employee monitoring to micromanage
One of the reasons that monitoring can be perceived negatively is that it feels like it’s being used to punish employees. They worry that it’s the software equivalent of a micromanaging boss staring over their shoulder while they work, just waiting for them to slip up.
Some employers do monitor internet use to make sure employees aren’t getting carried away, but did you know that so-called “unproductive” internet browsing has actually been found to have a positive impact on productivity?
It’s true! But only if that browsing doesn’t take up more than 12% of their work time.
Employees feel far better about being monitored when they’re given the autonomy to self-manage first. Managers can step in if things are getting carried away or if their employees are visiting clearly inappropriate websites.
The third and final tip I have for you today is to not monitor more than you have to.
Think about it this way – if I told you that I wanted to make sure that employee’s weren’t visiting not safe for work websites, you’d think I was crazy for asking for a direct feed into their webcams.
The bottom line is this:
If you can meet your company’s goals with a less invasive method of monitoring, do it that way.
For example, if you want some backup for your acceptable use policies you can use internet monitoring software to see what sites are being visited.
But there’s no need to track individual keystrokes
Or maybe you want to protect data from being stolen. You can monitor the flow of data without recording audio clips of private conversations
Finally, maybe you want to track the work habits of employees that are working remotely or from home. Give them a company-provided device rather than monitoring their personal computers
That’s it for now.
If you want learn more, check out our new white paper “Employee Monitoring: Best practices for balancing productivity, security and privacy”
You can find the link for that in the description below.
If you’d like to try out employee monitoring in your company, visit CurrentWare.com/Download for a free trial of BrowseReporter, our computer monitoring software.
And as always stay tuned to our YouTube channel for more videos about employee monitoring, cyber security, and CurrentWare’s workforce management software.
The best electronic surveillance system provides the flexibility you need to monitor employee computer activity while respecting workplace privacy expectations. Here are some of the best privacy and security enhancing features of BrowseReporter, CurrentWare’s employee monitoring software.
Give your employees access to their own activity data. They can see exactly what internet and application usage data is being captured and use the time tracking for their own benefit.
Automatically delete user activity data after a set period. Maintain auditable records of employee computer usage and time tracking for only as long as needed.
Display a custom message from time-to-time to notify your employees that their computer activity is being monitored.
Enable this feature to make the CurrentWare Client visible in the system tray of your employee’s computers.
Schedule BrowseReporter’s user activity tracking to only collect data during work time. Turn off monitoring during non-work hours and personal browsing periods.
Restrict access to user activity reports with a password-protected console and unique permissions for each manager. Easily provide access on an as-needed basis.
Employee monitoring software provides business owners with insights into how their workforce operates. For the best results, employers must be fully transparent about their goals and methods, involve a representative sample of employees in the planning process, contextualize the data they collect, and ensure that the data is kept safe from misuse.
Learn more best practices for monitoring employees with these articles
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
__cfruid | session | Cloudflare sets this cookie to identify trusted web traffic. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement | 1 year | Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category . |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
JSESSIONID | session | The JSESSIONID cookie is used by New Relic to store a session identifier so that New Relic can monitor session counts for an application. |
LS_CSRF_TOKEN | session | Cloudflare sets this cookie to track users’ activities across multiple websites. It expires once the browser is closed. |
OptanonConsent | 1 year | OneTrust sets this cookie to store details about the site's cookie category and check whether visitors have given or withdrawn consent from the use of each category. |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
__cf_bm | 30 minutes | This cookie, set by Cloudflare, is used to support Cloudflare Bot Management. |
_zcsr_tmp | session | Zoho sets this cookie for the login function on the website. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_calendly_session | 21 days | Calendly, a Meeting Schedulers, sets this cookie to allow the meeting scheduler to function within the website and to add events into the visitor’s calendar. |
_gaexp | 2 months 11 days 7 hours 3 minutes | Google Analytics installs this cookie to determine a user's inclusion in an experiment and the expiry of experiments a user has been included in. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_ga | 2 years | The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors. |
_ga_GY6RPLBZG0 | 2 years | This cookie is installed by Google Analytics. |
_gcl_au | 3 months | Provided by Google Tag Manager to experiment advertisement efficiency of websites using their services. |
_gid | 1 day | Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously. |
CONSENT | 2 years | YouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_opt_expid | past | Set by Google Analytics, this cookie is created when running a redirect experiment. It stores the experiment ID, the variant ID and the referrer to the page that is being redirected. |
IDE | 1 year 24 days | Google DoubleClick IDE cookies are used to store information about how the user uses the website to present them with relevant ads and according to the user profile. |
NID | 6 months | NID cookie, set by Google, is used for advertising purposes; to limit the number of times the user sees an ad, to mute unwanted ads, and to measure the effectiveness of ads. |
test_cookie | 15 minutes | The test_cookie is set by doubleclick.net and is used to determine if the user's browser supports cookies. |
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE | 5 months 27 days | A cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface. |
YSC | session | YSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages. |
yt-remote-connected-devices | never | YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video. |
yt-remote-device-id | never | YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video. |
yt.innertube::nextId | never | This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen. |
yt.innertube::requests | never | This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen. |
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
_dc_gtm_UA-6494714-6 | 1 minute | No description |
_gaexp_rc | past | No description available. |
34f6831605 | session | No description |
383aeadb58 | session | No description available. |
663a60c55d | session | No description available. |
6e4b8efee4 | session | No description available. |
c72887300d | session | No description available. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-tracking | 1 year | No description |
crmcsr | session | No description available. |
currentware-_zldp | 2 years | No description |
currentware-_zldt | 1 day | No description |
et_pb_ab_view_page_26104 | session | No description |
gaclientid | 1 month | No description |
gclid | 1 month | No description |
handl_ip | 1 month | No description available. |
handl_landing_page | 1 month | No description available. |
handl_original_ref | 1 month | No description available. |
handl_ref | 1 month | No description available. |
handl_ref_domain | 1 month | No description |
handl_url | 1 month | No description available. |
handl_url_base | 1 month | No description |
handlID | 1 month | No description |
HandLtestDomainName | session | No description |
HandLtestDomainNameServer | 1 day | No description |
isiframeenabled | 1 day | No description available. |
m | 2 years | No description available. |
nitroCachedPage | session | No description |
organic_source | 1 month | No description |
organic_source_str | 1 month | No description |
traffic_source | 1 month | No description available. |
uesign | 1 month | No description |
user_agent | 1 month | No description available. |
ZCAMPAIGN_CSRF_TOKEN | session | No description available. |
zld685336000000002056state | 5 minutes | No description |